Perfect Man

There lies a man with no motor or sensory function, who bear no long- aliveness breathe, eat, drink, or move on his own. He lies there as his life is easily draining away and you know as a medical professional that the whole thing keeping him resilient be the machines such as the ventilator, feeding tubes, quitovenous fluids, defibrillation equipment etc. You stand there deciphering the stop over results if he were to be taken forward the machine and a fight comes to mind.Your thoughts produce to race around in your level about whether it is wrong or scour out to let him lie there unceasingly being pumped to stay alive or whether you should take away the fight down and let him go to rest. There is no one simple answer to the conflict of whether it is right or wrong because the close does non lie in your hands. As a state law, if the diligent is not coherent to decide whether they want to insularism or stay on life support it goes to their designated someone, and if one was not found it automatically goes to next of kin (Murrow).As a medical professional your requirements atomic number 18 to adhere to the forbearings wishes and if they are not in stock(predicate) then the wishes of the family are to be met, even if the family chooses against unreal edible and hydration. The family may accept to be educated on on the nose what the artificial nutrition and hydration does for the individual. One reason writes, in a clinical ideal paper that, Most patients and families do not have the medical knowledge and clinical experience to make medical decisions by themselves and therefore need the physicians guidance.In which courting, explanation on why ANH should be given and the benefits of it may be expressed but with minimal, if not none, of your ain persuasion. There is controversy over this accurate debate of whether providing artificial nutrition is safe or not that it has actually prompted the Ameri whoremonger Academy of Hospice a nd Palliative Medicine to suggest that research be done and assessed in clinics so that clinical judgment and achievement can be used to look out when it is appropriate (Slomka).In one debate, a man named, Bozetti and his colleagues decided to examine patients quality of life who had progress cancer and who was on home parenteral nutrition (Fuhrman). In their study they notable that these patients were unplayfully malnourished, could barely swallow, if at all, and were no longer receiving the curative therapy (Fuhrman). Their findings were reported bet on that the quality of life overall was some(prenominal) better for the patients who received HPN for a token(prenominal) of 3 months into their final stages of life (Fuhrman).This study is one of many more that manifest that using nutrition and hydration in the end stages of life can be skilful in fulfilling the patients unavoidably to sustain life. There has been studies shown were artificial nutrition and hydration is beneficial in a case such as A person who has a temporary bout of severe nausea and vomiting or has looseness of the bowels causing serious dehydration can often benefit from a short course of intravenous fluids to rest the bowel (Arenella).Since this topic is so controversial the opponent side states that there are more, if not just as many, reasons why a person should not be held on life support. Many reasons include Tubes can damage and erode the lining of the gaunt passage, esophagus, stomach, or intestine other complaints of infections, irritations, dropsy and many more medical problems are stated as bad outcomes of artificial nutrition and hydration (WebMD). Although these issues can arise it is remedy important to note that if the wish of the patient is to stay alive, ANH is what is actually allowing them to sustain their life.